An act performed by a
speaker by virtue of uttering certain words, as for example the acts of
promising or of threatening. Illocutionary acts are
linguistic acts in which one can be said to do something - like stating,
denying or asking.
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta I-P. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta I-P. Mostrar todas las entradas
domingo, 23 de abril de 2017
Indefinite Numeral Adjective
Indefinite numeral
adjectives are those adjectives which do not show the exact numerical amount of
noun however give general idea of that amount.
For example:
Many, some, any, few, all, several, etc.
“I saw only
few people present at the meeting.”
Indefinite Pronouns
Indefinite pronouns are those referring to one or more unspecified
objects, beings, or places. They are called “indefinite” simply because they do
not indicate the exact object, being, or place to which they refer.
Indefinite pronouns include partitives such
as any, anybody, anyone, either, neither, nobody, no,
someone, and some; they also include universals such
as every, all, both, and each; finally, they include
quantifiers including any, some, several, enough, many, and much
There are just two important rules for using indefinite pronouns
correctly.
·
Indefinite pronouns are never plural. They are
always singular.
·
Because indefinite pronouns are singular, the pronouns or verbs used to
refer to them should also be singular.
Examples of Indefinite Pronouns
In the following examples, the indefinite pronouns are italicized.
·
Many are called, but few are
chosen.
·
Somebody ate
my sandwich!
·
Everyone says she is beautiful inside and out.
·
No one wants to hear about my health problems.
Inflectional morphology
Inflectional morphology is the study of the processes (such as
affixation and vowel change) that distinguish the forms of words in certain
grammatical categories.
In comparison to many other languages, the inflectional system of Modern
English is fairly limited. (See inflectional morphemes.)
Inflectional morphology is customarily distinguished from derivational
morphology (or word formation).
As A.Y. Aikhenvald points out, "Derivational morphology results in
the creation of a new word with a new meaning. In contrast, inflectional
morphology involves an obligatory grammatical specification characteristic of a
word class" ("Typological Distinctions in Word-Formation" in
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2007). This distinction, however,
is not always clear-cut.
Interrogative Adjectives
An Interrogative
adjective modifies a noun or a noun phrase and is similar to the interrogative
pronoun. It does not stand on its own and includes words such as, which, what,
who, whose, whom, where and so on.
For example:
'What dress are
you wearing?' Here, 'what' modifies the noun 'dress' and is the object of the
compound verb 'are wearing'.
Other examples:
Which
leaves turn color first?
Whose
son is he?
Interrogative pronouns
An interrogative pronoun is
a pronoun which is used to make asking questions easy. There are
just five interrogative pronouns. Each one is used to ask a very specific
question or indirect question.
Interrogative pronouns can also be used as relative
pronouns, which may be found in questions or indirect questions.
You’ll know for certain
that a pronoun is classified as an interrogative when it’s used in an inquiring
way, because interrogative pronouns are found only in question and
indirect questions.
·
Who
·
Whose
·
Whom
·
Which
·
What
What
Used to ask questions
about things, actions, activities, general descriptions and specific
information (unlimited choice).
·
What did
you buy?
·
What
happened?
·
What is
your brother like?
·
What sort of
cars do you like driving?
Which
Used to ask about
people or things (limited choice)
·
Which
students will participate?
·
Which
of these sweaters do you like best?
·
Which
color do you prefer?
·
She
asked which train to take.
Who
Used to ask about
people.
·
Who is
your best friend?
·
I’m
wondering who will be at the party.
·
Who is
going to take out the trash?
·
Who is that?
Whom
This interrogative
pronoun is rarely seen these days, but when it shows up, it is used to ask
questions about people. (More formal than who)
·
Whom did
you speak to?
·
Whom do
you prefer to vote for?
·
Whom do
you live with?

Whose
Used to ask questions
about people or objects, always related to possession.
·
Whose
sweater is this?
·
Whose
parents are those?
·
I
wonder whose dog knocked our garbage
can over.
In some cases,
interrogative pronouns take on the suffix –ever:
Whoever Whosoever Whomever Whosever
Irregular Verbs
Perhaps you think that "irregular" means
something out of the ordinary, and in common parlance it does, but if you look
up irregular in the dictionary, you'll see that the first definition is a
little different. "Irregular" describes something that does not
adhere to established rules.
Irregular verbs don’t take on the regular –d, -ed, or
-ied spelling patterns of the past simple, or past participle.
Irregular verbs live by their own set of rules; they
are the mavericks of the English language. Most of the verbs in the English
language are irregular verbs.
Irregular verbs are also known as strong verbs. Here
are nine that are used more often than the rest. These nine irregular verb
examples also happen to be among the most commonly used words in the English
language. They are:
Make Take
Come Know
Conjugation
for an Irregular Verb
Any verb that does not break down using the rules of
tenses like "to walk" is an irregular verb. That means that the
conjugation is not based on the rules of tenses; but rather on the specific
conjugation which is used for the word. This means that verbal conjugation is a
game of memorization. You need to memorize the specific conjugation for each
irregular verb.
The past tense and past participle are the forms that
are normally made in irregular fashion. About 200 verbs in normal use have
irregularities in one or other (or usually both) of these forms. They may
derive from Germanic strong verbs, as with sing–sang–sung or rise–rose–risen,
or from weak verbs which have come to deviate from the standard pattern in some
way (teach–taught–taught, keep–kept–kept, build–built–built, etc.). (Usually,
past participle sometimes ends in "n", "d" or
"ed".) They change in spelling sometimes. (Past and Past participle
only.)
Learning
Irregular Verbs
Since there are no specific rules regarding
conjugating the tenses of irregular verbs, the only way to really learn them is
to keep your ears open.
Impact
of the Misuse of Irregular Verbs
The English language works, more or less, without
paying too much attention to whether the speaker is using the verb correctly or
not. When an English learner says, "yesterday I speaked with the
President," it makes as much sense as if he'd said "spoke." That flexibility is why English remains the
lingua franca; one does not have to speak it properly to be understood.
Since people can understand English even when it is
spoken incorrectly, using an irregular verb correctly isn't critical to be
understood. Other languages have conjugation rules that are all but required
just to get a simple point across. In English following the rules are not
critical to be understood.
Benefit
of Proper Use of Irregular Verbs
If you want to sound intelligent or at least like a
native speaker, you should mind your irregular verbs. They aren't hard to
remember, and they really do make a difference when you're speaking with anyone
whose opinion you care about. Having a firm grasp on one’s irregular verbs
displays a command of the English language. Most importantly, if you know your
irregular verbs, you'll sound smart.
Lexical Morphology
Lexical Morphology is a
theoretical model first proposed in Pesetsky (1979), and elaborated in Kiparsky
(1982). Although it is impossible to say that there is a single model of
Lexical Morphology (also known as Lexical Phonology), all theories have in
common that the word formation rules and the phonological rules both apply in a
single component of the grammar, viz. the Lexicon.
We will present here a brief
outline of Kiparsky's (1982) model, and next refer to a number of publications
in which this model has undergone more or less significant changes. Siegel's
(1974) Level Ordering Hypothesis and the Kiparsky-Mascaró theory of Cyclic
Phonology lie at the heart of the development of Kiparsky's (1982) model of
Lexical Morphology/Phonology. Within Cyclic Phonology it is assumed that
cyclicity is a stipulated property of rules, and that cyclic application is a
mode of application which is not an inherent property of the grammar. The basic
idea of Kiparsky's (1982) paper is that the cyclic application of phonological
rules should follow from the organization of the lexicon.
Lexicon
Is
the vocabulary of a person, language,
or branch of knowledge (such as nautical or medical).
In linguistics, a lexicon is a
language's inventory of lexemes. The
word "lexicon" derives from the Greek λεξικόν (lexicon),
neuter of λεξικός (lexikos) meaning "of or
for words.
Lexicology
It is the part of linguistics which studies words. This
may include their nature and function as symbols, their meaning, the
relationship of their meaning to epistemology in general, and the
rules of their composition from smaller elements (morphemes such as the
English -ed marker for past or un- for
negation; and phonemes as basic sound units).
Linking Verbs (Copulative Verbs)
Linking
verbs do not express action. Instead, they connect the subject of
the verb to
additional information about the subject. They show a relationship between the subject of the
sentence and a noun or adjective being linked to it.
My dog is an Akita. (Dog and Akita are linked because they are the same
thing.)
My cat is very furry. (Cat and furry are linked because furry describes the cat.)
My cat is very furry. (Cat and furry are linked because furry describes the cat.)
·
The most common linking verbs are forms of the
verb to
be: am, is, are, was, were,
being, been.
·
Other common linking verbs
include: appear, become, feel,
grow, look, remain, seem, smell, sound, stay, taste, and turn.
To check if these are being used as linking verbs, try replacing them
with the correct form of to be. If they make sense and have almost
the same meaning, they are linking verbs.
Laurie appears tired
Locutionary
It is the performance
of an utterance, and hence of a speech act. The term equally refers
to the surface meaning of an utterance because, a speech act should be analysed
as a locutionary act, as well as an illocutionary act (the semantic 'illocutionary force' of the
utterance, thus its real, intended meaning), and in certain cases a
further perlocutionary act (i.e. its actual effect,
whether intended or not).
Material Nouns
Material Noun are names of
materials or substances out of which things are made. Ex: gold, iron, silver
etc.”
Material noun is the name given to the
material, substance or things made up of alloy. It refers to the type of
substance instead of individual particles of the substance. Material nouns are
not countable means we cannot count them because they are in the forms of
liquid, semi-liquid or solid. This noun is especially called as material noun
because nouns in this class are almost materials like cloth, air, metal, gold,
salt, iron, silver, steel, brass, bronze, copper, aluminium, lead, coal, coral,
gem, diamond, glass, fibre, calcium, plastic, rubber, paper, cement, paint,
plywood, synthetics, shampoo, soap, perfume, wine, tar, chemical, rexene etc.
Sometimes we cannot make the plural forms of material noun.
Some of the material nouns are used as the
count nouns, for example; 'wine' as one may talk about different wines, type of
wine instead of the substance of wine. So, here we can say that wine is not a
material noun as type of wine is countable. We can say that material nouns are
common nouns as they denote substances instead of denoting people or places.
For
examples:
- Cotton dresses are very cheap and comfortable.
- My mom purchased
a gold ring for me.
- I drink milk in
the silver
- My father has a shop
for diamonds.
- Calcium is a good mineral for health.
- Plastic is made up of many molecules of
ethylene.
- There are many
utensils in my kitchen made up of iron.
- Taj Mahal is built
using marbles.
- I drink milk daily
in the night.
- Most of the industries
use fibre.
- In the ancient time,
most of the kitchen utensils were made up of brass.
Categorized Examples of Material Nouns
Material nouns are names given to the raw
elements or objects exist in the nature and cannot be created by human being,
however many new things can be created by man using raw materials. The main
source of raw materials are nature, animals and plants. We have provided below
the list of common nouns under various categories such as:
Material nouns from nature: water,
air, silver, gold, iron, copper, sand, coal, rock, sunlight, rain, earth, salt,
etc.
Material nouns from animals: egg,
meat, honey, milk, silk, leather, wool, etc.
Material nouns from plants: cotton,
food, oil, wood, jute, coffee, medicine, tea, rubber, perfume, etc.
Man made material nouns: acid,
alcohol, asphalt, brick, cement, butter, chalk, ghee, cheese, dacron, ebony,
enamel, felt, gelatin, paraffin, cloth, etc.
Rules to be followed while using material nouns in the Sentence:
Following are the rules you need to remember
in order to make use of material nouns in the sentence.
a) Generally, articles (a, an or the) are not
used with material nouns when they are uncountable such as:
- Honey is wholesome food and beneficial to
health.
- Water boils only at 100°C temperature.
b) Articles (a and an) may be used with
material nouns when they are countable (denoting types of material or showing
helping nature) such as:
- I would like to
eat a Dutch cheese.
- It is a very
healthy wine.
c) Use of 'the' and 'some' can also be done
in the following way:
- The honey in
the bottle is mine. Don’t
give it others!
- I saw there is
some milk in the glass.
Meaning
Ferdinand
de Saussure in founding semiology, his original subset of the semiotics,
started describing language in terms of Signs, dividing those signs in turn
into signifieds and signifiers. The signifier is the perceptive side of a sign,
thus the sound form in case of oral language. The signified is the signification
(semantic) side, the mental construction or image associated with the sound, by
either a speaker and hearer. A sign, then, is essentially a relationship
between signified and signifier.
Signs are
essentially conventional, as any foreign language student is well aware: there
is no reason that bat couldn't mean "body of water" or even
"that bust of Napoleon over there". Since the choice of signifiers is
ultimately arbitrary, the meaning cannot somehow be in the signifier. Saussure
instead defers meaning to the sign itself: meaning is ultimately the same thing
as the sign, and meaning means that relationship is between signified and
signifier. All meaning is both within us and communal, thus cultural. Signs
"mean" by reference to our internal lexicon and grammar, and despite
there being a matter of convention, so the communal part, signs also, because
of the individual's uniqueness, can mean something only to the individual (what
red means to one person may not be what red means to another, either in absolute
value, or by including what's suggested by the context). However, while
meanings carried by one given set of signifiers may vary to some extent from
individual to individual, only those meanings that stay within a boundary are
seen by other speakers of the language to belong to the language: if one were
to refer to smells as red, most other speakers would assume the person is
talking nonsense (although statements like this are common among people who
experience synesthesia, or in poetry).
Metaphor
Metaphor
is a figure of speech that refers, for rhetorical effect, to one thing by
mentioning another thing. It may provide clarity or identify hidden
similarities between two ideas. Antithesis, hyperbole, metonymy and simile are
all types of metaphor. One of the most commonly cited examples of a metaphor
in English literature is the "All the world's a stage" monologue from
As You Like It:
All the
world's a stage,
And all
the men and women merely players;
They have
their exits and their entrances[...]
—William
Shakespeare, As You Like It, 2/7
This
quotation expresses a metaphor because the world is not literally a stage. By
asserting that the world is a stage, Shakespeare uses points of comparison
between the world and a stage to convey an understanding about the mechanics of
the world and the behavior of the people within it.
The
Philosophy of Rhetoric (1937) by rhetorician I. A. Richards describes a
metaphor as having two parts: the tenor and the vehicle. The tenor is the
subject to which attributes are ascribed. The vehicle is the object whose
attributes are borrowed. In the previous example, "the world" is
compared to a stage, describing it with the attributes of "the
stage"; "the world" is the tenor, and "a stage" is the
vehicle; "men and women" is the secondary tenor, and
"players" is the secondary vehicle.
Metonymy
Metonymy
is a figure of speech in which a thing or concept is referred to by the name of
something closely associated with that thing or concept. The words metonymy
and metonym come from the Greek: μετωνῠμία, metōnymía, ("a change of
name"), from μετά, metá, ("after, beyond"), and -ωνυμία,
-ōnymía, a suffix that names figures of speech, from ὄνῠμα, ónyma or ὄνομα,
ónoma, ("name").
The
location of a capital is often used as a metonym for a government or other
official institutions—for example: Brussels for the institutions of the
European Union, Nairobi for the government of Kenya, Washington, D.C., for the
federal government of the United States, or Beacon Hill for the government of
the U.S. state of Massachusetts. A place can represent an entire industry: for
instance Wall Street is often used metonymically to describe the entire U.S.
financial and corporate banking sector. Common nouns and phrases can also be
metonyms: red tape can stand for bureaucracy, whether or not that bureaucracy
actually uses red tape to bind documents. In Commonwealth realms, The Crown is
a metonym for the state in all its aspects.
Metonymy
and related figures of speech are common in everyday speech and writing.
Synecdoche and metalepsis are considered specific types of metonymy. Polysemy,
multiple meanings of a single word or phrase, sometimes results from relations
of metonymy. Both metonymy and metaphor involve the substitution of one term
for another. In metaphor, this substitution is based on some specific
analogy between two things, whereas in metonymy the substitution is based on
some understood association or contiguity.
American
literary theorist Kenneth Burke described metonymy as one of four "master
tropes": metaphor, a substitute for perspective; metonymy, a substitute
for reduction; synecdoche, a substitute for representation; and irony, a
substitute for dialectic. He described these tropes and the way they overlap in
A Grammar of Motives.
In
addition to its use in everyday speech, metonymy is a figure of speech in some
poetry and in much rhetoric. Greek and Latin scholars of rhetoric made
significant contributions to the study of metonymy.
Modal Auxiliary Verbs.
Modal auxiliary verbs never change
form. You cannot add an -ed, -ing, or -s
ending to these words. Can, could, may,
might,
must,
ought
to, shall, should, will, and would
have only one form.
You can use modal auxiliary verbs
in these patterns:
MODAL + MAIN VERB
MODAL + BE + PRESENT PARTICIPLE
MODAL
+ HAVE + PAST PARTICIPLE
With modal auxiliaries, you can
indicate necessity or obligation:
To lose her orange glow, Yvonne should
eat fewer carrots.
John must remember his wife's
birthday this year.
If Cecilia wants a nice lawn, she ought
to be raking the leaves.
Or you can show possibility:
Fred might share his calculus
homework if you offer him a slice of pizza.
Ann could have run the half
marathon if she had started to train four months ago.
Modal auxiliaries also show willingness or ability:
Nicole will babysit your pet
iguana for a reasonable fee.




















